Currently, generative artificial intelligence and deep synthesis technologies are reshaping the logic of information production with disruptive power. While continuously fostering new quality productive forces, they also a series of new challenges for cyberspace ecological governance. General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out that "we must adhere to the unity of development and governance, and the integration of online and activities, to broadly gather forces for positive and benevolent development." In the era of artificial intelligence, cyberspace ecological governance has become an important pillar of the modernization of national governance. Strengthening cyberspace governance and guiding artificial intelligence toward positive and benevolent development requires coordinated efforts across four dimensions: strategic positioning, value stance, institutional supply, and capacity foundation

Grasp the strategic positioning and embed cyberspace ecological governance into the overall picture of national governance modernization. "There is no national security without, and no modernization without informatization." This important judgment by General Secretary Xi Jinping profoundly reveals the dual nature of cyberspace. As the core engine of the new round of scientific and technological and the key support for new quality productive forces, the rapid development of artificial intelligence inevitably calls for adaptive changes in the superstructure, promoting the simultaneous upgrading of the governance system and governance. Currently, with the deep intertwining of algorithm ranking power, content amplification power, and traffic distribution power, and the comprehensive penetration of data elements into social operations, the cyberspace ecology transcended the scope of virtual space, evolving into a second space that shapes social mindsets, builds value consensus, and influences the real-world order. To this end, we adhere to the Party's management of the Internet, data, and algorithms, incorporate cyberspace ecological governance into the overall national security concept and the overall layout of Digital China construction, build forward-looking institutional framework with laws and regulations such as the Cybersecurity Law, the Data Security Law, and the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services, and a full-chain governance system covering technological research and development, application implementation, risk prevention and control, and responsibility traceability. We must adhere to the unity of development and governance, delineate controllable, accountable, and sustainable development track, firmly grasp the leadership, management, and discourse power over cyberspace ideological work, transform the institutional advantages of socialism with Chinese characteristics into cyberspace governance efficiency, and build a solid digital security barrier for the long-term stability and modernization of the country.

Uphold the value position and practice the people-centered development philosophy. Cyberspace is the shared spiritual home of hundreds of of people. The ultimate standard for evaluating the effectiveness of governance is, in essence, the people's sense of gain, happiness, and security. This is also the core identifier distinguishes China's cyberspace governance with Chinese characteristics from the Western capital-dominated and technology-supremacist models. In recent years, the risk of technological alienation has to extent eroded public interests, posing a risk of deviating from the principle of technology serving the people. For example, deepfake audio and video, powered by AI pipelines, can rapidly, be mass-produced, and spread across platforms, making it difficult for individuals to protect their rights due to challenges in evidence collection, slow accountability, and high costs. Elderly groups rural residents are prone to encountering digital divides and even algorithmic divides under complex algorithmic logic. Issues such as price discrimination reveal that algorithms are not neutral, ignoring social fairness and public interests. address these pain points, the people-centered position must be implemented into specific rules, refined into pragmatic measures, and translated into governance effectiveness. On the user side, personalized recommendation should be made optional with one-click protection mechanisms, and a comprehensive system for warning, intercepting, and tracing cyber violence should be established to safeguard users' right to know and to choose. On the group side, age-appropriate modifications need to be extended from applications to government terminals and grassroots service windows, rural digital infrastructure should be upgraded, and regular digital training should be provided to effectively narrow the digital divide. On the content side, core socialist values must be embedded into recommendation rankings, stable channels should be reserved for authoritative information and highquality content, the negative feedback loop of traffic supremacy should be broken, and the proliferation of vulgar, sensational, and false content must be resolutely curbed

Improve the supply of systems and rules, and build strong rigid constraints through the protection of the rule of law and systemic synergy. Law is the foundation of governance Cyberspace is by no means a lawless land, and the governance of the network ecosystem in the era of artificial intelligence requires establishing rules through the rule of law and aggregating strength synergy.General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out: "We must adhere to governing the internet, operating the internet, and using the internet according to the law, so that the operates healthily on the track of the rule of law."Facing the mismatch between the iterative speed of artificial intelligence and the complexity of regulation, the construction of the rule of law must embody both-line thinking and agile flexibility, balancing institutional stability with practical adaptability. The prominent contradiction facing current governance lies in the fact that algorithmic black boxes and cross-border data flows make the linear accountability model of "whoever publishes is responsible" inadequate, while the regulatory power of a single department is difficult to cope with the cross-overlapping of platform ecosystems and the-domain linkage of risk transmission, which easily leads to problems such as regulatory blind spots, suspended responsibilities, and delayed handling. In response to this, an institutional system of agile and multi-center co-governance should be constructed to create a governance pattern with clear rights and responsibilities, efficient synergy, and closed-loop operation. On the one hand implement graded and classified management, carry out filing and security assessments for high-risk areas such as generative services, deep synthesis, and biometric identification, introduce third-party audits and algorithmic assessments, and improve risk monitoring, early warning, and handling mechanisms to avoid a one-size-fits-all approach that stifles innovation; on the other hand, consolidate the responsibilities of platforms, clarify the standard operating procedures for key links such as content security, protection of minors, and data security, and refine the statutory obligations of platforms in auditing handling, and reporting. More importantly, construct a comprehensive governance pattern of synergistic efforts involving Party leadership, government regulation, platform responsibility, industry self-discipline, and public participation. Through-departmental clue sharing, joint law enforcement, and emergency linkage, fragmented regulatory forces can be integrated into a single rope, strengthening grassroots governance and territorial responsibilities, so that lawabiding parties can proceed smoothly while law-breakers find it difficult to move an inch.

Consolidate the capability foundation and drive technological governance from external regulation to a combination of external regulation and endogenous goodness. wise adapt to the times, and the knowledgeable act according to the circumstances. Cyber ecosystem governance must rely on the external constraints of systems and make good use of the internal drivers of, achieving resonance and synchronized upgrades between governance and technology. To break free from the passive situation where "technology runs fast and governance struggles to keep up," the fundamental solution lies in embedding and values into the technological architecture, achieving a paradigm shift from passive response to active prevention and control, and from external constraints to endogenous goodness. Currently, risks such as deepfake scams bulk account manipulation, and automated rumor generation can no longer be handled by simple manual review. Therefore, it is imperative to accelerate the layout of technological capability construction in multiple directions and the supporting role of science and technology in governance. On the risk identification front, accelerate the research and development of deepfake detection, content origin tracing, and automated evidence collection technologies, a multimodal intelligent monitoring system, and achieve rapid evidence fixation and diffusion interception; on the security engineering front, embed algorithm security assessment, privacy computing, and minimum privilege access control into the product development lifecycle, promote "security by design," and make compliance an embedded requirement rather than an add-on; on the value embedding front, build a high-quality mainstream corpus, drive recommendation systems to shift from simply "optimizing user engagement" to "optimizing public information quality under constraints," and guide algorithms to lean towards positive energy, authority, fairness.
Cyber ecosystem governance is a long-term and arduous systemic project that concerns national security, people's well-being, and the nation's future. It is a governance task that must be successfully addressed to advance Chinese-style modernization. At this historical juncture where artificial intelligence is reshaping the global landscape, we must always adhere to Xi Jinping Thought on with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era as our guide, thoroughly implement General Secretary Xi Jinping's important thoughts on building a strong cyber power, firmly grasp the strategic positioning, uphold value stance, improve institutional supply, and consolidate the capability foundation. We should plan according to the trend, act in response to the trend, and follow the trend, continuously improving the level of the cyber ecosystem governance system and governance capabilities, and building a clear, orderly, secure, trustworthy, and positive cyberspace. This will ensure that the achievements of the new round scientific and technological revolution truly serve hundreds of millions of people, injecting strong digital and intelligent momentum into the comprehensive construction of a modern socialist country and the realization of the great rejuvenation of the nation.